Giovanni Azua wrote:
hi,

I was researching a bit alternatives to dojo e.g. YUI or separate widgets like a tooltip developed and distributed under GPL license and found some comments from Struts contributors mentioning that because of those widgets being GPL they could not be considered ...

I am absolutely not an expert in the subject but having a project under GPL v3 (and researched and read a bit on it) one of the main advantages of v3 was the major revision that lead to compatibility with the Apache v2 license projects see <http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-compatible_licenses> My question is then, would this mean that if e.g. a widget is distributed under GPL v3 it could be used and distributed with Struts 2?

Maybe it would be worthwhile to clarify this, as it could mean wider freedom of choice integrating existing GPL v3 projects with Struts ...

IANAL, but my reading of the FSF license compatibility discussion is that the ASF license is compatible with a project using GPLv3, *not* that GPLv3 is compatible with an ASF licensed project like Struts. In other words, GPL'd projects can now import ASF licensed libraries but ASF licensed projects still cannot use GPL'd libs.

It *is* possible that LGPLv3 may now be an acceptable license for dependencies, though. (I haven't looked at it to see if the objectionable clauses have been revised...)

This has probably been discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] already, and that is the correct place to get an ASF-wide policy change approved if it's appropriate.

L.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to