After looking into the proposed solution, I'm not sure if it's the right thing to do. The code where I need the extension runs in the portlet dispatcher, before the ActionInvocation has been created. So it would access the ActionContext before it has actually been created. I think I need to access the action extension property from the container in a way...
Nils-H On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so I have to look up the current executing action and it's action > mapping from the action context? I'll try that. Thanks. > > Nils-H > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The ActionMapping contains the original extension that request was >> submitted with. You can retrieve the ActionMapping either via the >> ServetActionContext or the portlet dispatcher. >> >> Don >> >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm looking at WW-2622 and I need to get the configured action >>> extension for the application. Is there a way to obtain this from a >>> class that is not instantiated by the core container? >>> >>> Nils-H >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
