After looking into the proposed solution, I'm not sure if it's the
right thing to do. The code where I need the extension runs in the
portlet dispatcher, before the ActionInvocation has been created. So
it would access the ActionContext before it has actually been created.
I think I need to access the action extension property from the
container in a way...

Nils-H

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so I have to look up the current executing action and it's action
> mapping from the action context? I'll try that. Thanks.
>
> Nils-H
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The ActionMapping contains the original extension that request was
>> submitted with.  You can retrieve the ActionMapping either via the
>> ServetActionContext or the portlet dispatcher.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm looking at WW-2622 and I need to get the configured action
>>> extension for the application. Is there a way to obtain this from a
>>> class that is not instantiated by the core container?
>>>
>>> Nils-H
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to