Any more comments? The question has come up a few times on the user list in the last week or two. My proposal is an incremental improvement (if tiny); if we switch to commons-validator at least their JavaScript code could be re-used.
Dave --- On Wed, 9/10/08, Dave Newton wrote: > --- On Tue, 9/9/08, Jeromy Evans wrote: > > I don't use S2's client-side validation myself > as its too fragile, and > > this improvement won't help that. (fragile as in > its hardcoded to match > > a theme's tag structure and breaks if a tag is > out-of-place). > > I was also going to add some ids here and there, mostly for > styling purposes, but the label-finding code would also be > much-simplified and a tad more resilient. > > But the primary motivation was to allow a way of adding > more client-side validations w/o a major undertaking. I know > it's kinda hacky. > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
