--- On Wed, 10/22/08, Philip Luppens wrote: > - Documentation: no more (example) documentation in the > Javadocs so non-committers can make changes in the wiki.
I'd augment this a bit I'd really like all the examples to be in source control and have associated tests, and I'm willing to spend some effort to do that (starting at the beginning of 2009; this year is packed). Yes, that means that either non-committers can't write "official" examples, although un-official examples would be supported--as they are now--on the wiki. I don't see a whole lot of non-developer-driven examples, however, although they exist. We're still hammered by documentation (2.0 v. 2.1 issues) and I'd *really* like to see two Confluence spaces for that. Yeah, I know 2.1 is (in theory) rolling soon, but not everyone may upgrade right away. I'm also willing to put some work into that. I agree with one of the initial statements that the documentation could be better organized, although I think that could be handled with some aggregate pages that organize existing documentation in different (hopefully better) ways. I also like the tags being documented through the annotations, but either the annotations or the processing tool should include some information regarding when attributes were introduced etc. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
