Since Struts 2.1 does not have a GA release yet, I think it's
acceptable to drop J4 support too. However, make it as easy as
possible to build the J4 support libraries with documentation, and a
*supported* Maven profile.
Paul
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for dropping in 2.1, along with keeping it in 2.0.X
>
> Rainer Hermanns schrieb:
>>
>> I'd vote with +1 for dropping j4-support in Struts 2.1.X
>> but with -1 for Struts 2.0.X because of known users using
>> previous 2.0.X backported releases and that are waiting for
>> another stable GA release for their production systems.
>>
>> just my 0.02€,
>> cheers,
>> Rainer
>>
>>> Yes, my thoughts were on that direction, drop out direct support and
>>> document what needs to be done, for those that still need it.
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I know someone already asked this but, shouldn't we drop
>>>>> the jdk4 support already?
>>>>
>>>> +1, but I'll add a wiki page giving a brief overview of the retro
>>>> process
>>>> ("Run this batch file, loser!")
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
