it does, but the point it to make it less redundant, when you have many fields in one block, like the "with" keyword in some languages (Pascal? VB?)
musachy On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be something like: >> >> <s:form name="myForm"> >> <s:push value="person.address"> >> <s:textfield name="street"/> >> </s:push> >> </s:form> >> > > Wouldn't <s:textfield name="person.address.street"> to the trick? > > Nils-H > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
