it does, but the point it to make it less redundant, when you have many fields in one block, like the "with" keyword in some languages (Pascal? VB?)
musachy On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <nil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be something like: >> >> <s:form name="myForm"> >> <s:push value="person.address"> >> <s:textfield name="street"/> >> </s:push> >> </s:form> >> > > Wouldn't <s:textfield name="person.address.street"> to the trick? > > Nils-H > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
