Agreed on keeping simple theme to just the HTML-based tags. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes I agree with James, we can do that in 2.2 after some testing is > done. Also, not all tags in the simple theme are implemented. I didn't > implement the ones that have javascript and are not just wrappers > around html, like the optionstransferselect. These tags shouldn't be > in the simple theme, IMO. > > musachy > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: > > That's fine, I just think we should have an agreed-upon, documented > > strategy for Struts users and developers. Doing an 'svn move' is > > pretty easy - creating a migration strategy, documenting it, writing > > tests to ensure the transition goes smoothly, keeping on top of bugs, > > etc, there are the tricky bits. Of course, being open source, I'd be > > happy for 3 out of the 4 :) > > > > Don > > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:35 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> > wrote: > >> In my opinion the Java-tags should ultimately become the default in say > 2.2 > >> or 2.3, but for now they should be a "supported, experimental" plugin > >> packaged with core. I say that because I think it's a little early to > have > >> them replace the time-tested FreeMarker-based tags. If we can get them > out > >> in the wild in 2.1 and people start using them, we can work out the > kinks > >> and then make them the default. > >> > >> Perhaps the FreeMarker-based tags ultimately move to the Sandbox?? > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Neat, I'm glad to see work finally being done on the tags. What > >>> exactly would this mean for 2.1 and 2.2? Would this be the default > >>> template engine for the tags? Will the documentation need to be > >>> rewritten? How do we keep the engines in sync if we keep the > >>> freemarker and velocity engines around? Do we have any tests for > >>> that? > >>> > >>> Don > >>> > >>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > As mentioned on the other thread I's like to propose to move the java > >>> > tags out of the sandbox into the core plugins bundled with the > >>> > distribution, so they will be part of the 2.1 release. > >>> > > >>> > here is +1 > >>> > > >>> > musachy > >>> > -- > >>> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
