> Nonethess, it makes sense to make the java templates extensible. I can see > plently of developers using > them especially if they provide a performance boost as implied in the > documentation. The way the chaining handlers are set up should make the > implementation/maintenance manageable (I hope).
Yup, I agree. > > BTW, the trajectory for the dojo ajax tags was to use a different tag > library (sx) for ajax enabled tags rather than triggering 'ajaxness' with a > theme attribute (was 'ajax'). I assume this is still preferable for any > other ajax library? IMO Themes are better if we think that enough people will overwrite them, if that is not the case, it is easier for users to just use a different taglib (they can still overwrite the templates) musachy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
