Hello, I was wondering what the approach was to writing annotation-based interceptors. I see several interceptors have annotation-based counterparts (validation), but others do not (roles). Is there a specific reason for not having annotation-based counterparts for all interceptors? Or is it mainly that the annotation-based ones have not been requested? I was about to finalize an annotation-based roles interceptor, but was then reconsidering, as a change in permissions would require a re-build + re-deploy if it was annotation based, whereas the original xml-configured one would require (at the most) a re-deploy. But this argument would also hold for the annotation-based validation vs. xml validation.
Thoughts? Brian Relph ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.
