On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:09:08 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Andreas Joseph
> Krogh<andr...@officenet.no> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:14:00 am Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >> 2.7 has been out for a while, so it should not be *that* risky, but I
> >> wouldn't include it in 2.1.8 with such a short notice and no testing.
> >
> > FWIW; Any performance-improvements to OGNL are welcome, so I'm all for
> > including 2.7.x in 2.1.8, even if it means delaying the release some to
> > allow testing.
> >
>
> Although I agree with your sentiment (OGNL performance improvements
> are needed), I disagree that we should postpone 2.1.8, 2.1.7 didn't
> pass because I missed a detail, but from 2.1.6 to now, we are sitting
> on a ton of closed JIRA issues. As soon as Rainer is able to get us
> xwork 2.1.5, I am going to get 2.1.8 out. I think we should work on
> getting OGNL out as soon as possible, but I don't want to delay 2.1.8
> to get it... Thoughts?
I was maybe a little too precise in pointing out 2.1.8, but what I'd like to
see is an updated OGNL *before* 2.2 is released, in 2.1.9+ or so.
Releasing 2.1.8 as soon as xwork-2.1.5 is out seems very reasonable.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@officenet.no>
Senior Software Developer / CTO
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
1414 Trollåsen | somebody else doing it wrong, without |
NORWAY | comment. |
| |
Tlf: +47 24 15 38 90 | |
Fax: +47 24 15 38 91 | |
Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
