yup I am ok with that. On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Rene Gielen<[email protected]> wrote: > Besides the wrong versioning (XW 2.1.5 vs. 2.1.8), that's a reasonable > plan. To clarify the possible S2.2 plan as I understand (and prefer) it, > it would be a struts2-xwork module within S2 build and release cycle, > providing an artifact on which struts2-core depends - could we get a > consensus on this? > > Dale Newfield schrieb: >> Is this an accurate summary? >> >> struts-2.1.8: still waiting on xwork-2.1.8 >> >> struts-2.2.x: assuming IP clearance process passes for xwork, fork it >> and have it still be a separate jar, but within the struts2 package. >> (Probably the only real change would be package names.) >> >> struts-3.x: merge struts2 and xwork. >> >> -Dale >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -- > René Gielen > IT-Neering.net > Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany > Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770 > Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771 > Cel: +49-(0)177-3194448 > http://twitter.com/rgielen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
-- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
