sorry, I just haven't had time to craft a lengthy response...

Basically, if we add the group 'confluence-users' or something like
that, then that will map to any registered user.

The short end of the story here is that if we've been burned once and
make the conscious decision to go back to the same setup, I don't want
to be the one chastised :) (since I originally posted about the
spammer on infra@)

-Wes

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was talking to Wes and he forwarded me the infra thread (not much of
> a thread), and this doesn't seem to be a policy or anything, more like
> someone just went ahead and removed the rights. I am looking at the
> admin console but I haven't found how to do it yet, @Martin, do you
> know how to give the rights back?
>
> Wes is busy, but he will chime in here later.
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> can we please give the rights back to the users? I have got a couple
>> of emails asking about it.
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Martin Cooper<mart...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Musachy Barroso<musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Martin Cooper<mart...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> I understand the infra position, but if we now require that anyone who
>>>>> wants to edit the non-official spaces needs to ask for permission, and
>>>>> be added to a group, before they can start, that's going to be a pain
>>>>> for us to manage, and it's going to mean that some people just won't
>>>>> bother. My personal preference would be to leave it as it used to be
>>>>> unless we're having serious repeated wiki spamming problems.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I totally agree with this. We don't have that many spammers and we
>>>> catch them pretty fast. We have few people that edit the wiki so we
>>>> need to make it easier not harder. Is this a decision across the board
>>>> or we can change this rule just for us?
>>>
>>> I don't know the answer to this. Wes mentioned that the infra team had
>>> "suggested" what we have now. Wes, can you elaborate on whether this
>>> is something we're expected to adhere to now? If not, and it really
>>> was only a suggestion, I'd be happy to change it back.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Cooper
>>>
>>>
>>>> musachy
>>>> --
>>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Wes Wannemacher

Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
Ask me for a quote!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to