I still don't understand why we don't let users know that there is a build that we are testing so we get more eyes on it, before we call it a GA. Is there any practical reason? or is it just the way it has always been done?
musahcy On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com> wrote: > I was sort of thinking the same thing... I know I'll check the docs > zip in the future, but I think it's a legitimate mistake that most of > us aren't looking in the docs zip (since we've all already read them > all, cover to cover, right?) :) > > -Wes > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>. In fact, I >>> would ask those who voted on 2.1.8 to look at how they tested before >>> they voted, and perhaps think about ways in which they might change >>> their testing so that we can catch something like this before it goes >>> out in a release again. >> >> Hey my windows partition is just for playing video games :) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > Ask me for a quote! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
