On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey guys, > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a > few weeks while people test.
I believe you are, in fact, misremembering. ;-) A few weeks would be rather too long, I think. For a full release, I think we used to leave about a week between announcing the test build and kicking off the corresponding vote. > In the case of 2.1.8.1, I only made changes to > the assembly artifact (in particular, how the docs zips are constructed). I > announced the build being available almost one week ago, which is obviously > less than a few weeks, but since the changes are not related to any 'code' > and that there were complaints about the docs, I thinking of calling a vote. > Personally, I would just like to get this version out since it fixes the > docs/zip problems in 2.1.8. > > Does anyone want to leave 2.1.8.1 sitting longer? I think we should be fine with kicking off the vote now. -- Martin Cooper > -Wes > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > Ask me for a quote! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
