I'd suggest using Guice trunk and the JSR annotations rather than the Guice annotations. I'd also make the injector pluggable so that people can plug in Spring/Guice/etc easily.
-bp On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > I have talked to a couple of people before and everyone seems to agree > that using guice instead of our internal IoC container (guice pre 1.0 > I think), would be a good idea. I don't have any experience with guice > 2.0, but looking at the docs it seems like porting our stuff would not > be that hard. Less code to maintain, and we get more > features/improvements. If we go with this idea, guice would be shaded > into xwork to avoid classpath conflicts. > > what do you think? > > musachy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
