What if application needs expirable and parallel (say 5 instances at a time) wizard?
andreak wrote: > > On Thursday 10. December 2009 15.31.15 Alex Siman wrote: >> >> Wes Wannemacher wrote: >> > >> > "Everything is tied to either the request >> > or the session, I can't build wizard-style views" >> > >> Yeah, we need wizards sometimes. > > I would argue that it would be nice to have, but not a must. Most > implementations I've seen of "conversation"-scope are rather messy and > don't provide anything beyond what you can achieve with > ScopedModelDriver(scope=session) and some custom-code. I've built several, > robust, wizard-like UIs using Struts2 without any problems. > > -- > Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@officenet.no> > Senior Software Developer / CTO > ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ > OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to | > Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch | > 1414 Trollåsen | somebody else doing it wrong, without | > NORWAY | comment. | > | | > Tlf: +47 24 15 38 90 | | > Fax: +47 24 15 38 91 | | > Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | | > ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/struts-2.2-and-guice-tp26594350p26730390.html Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
