yeah I agree with that. it looks ugly but it is better, by far IMO.
musachy
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dale Newfield <d...@newfield.org> wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> I think it would come handy an explanation of why some attributes are
>> expected to be strings, while other are values, like:
>>
>> <s:input name="somestring" />
>>
>> vs
>>
>> <s:property value="somevalue" />
>
> I think in the tutorials, documentation, etc. we should use the %{} syntax
> explicitly everyplace. If someone wants a string, for example, and not to a
> lookup, it is quite confusing to a new struts user that they need to change
> value="FOO" to value="%{'FOO'}", but if they're used to seeing
> value="%{FOO}" then it isn't so confusing.
>
> This also might make the progression from OGNL to JUEL or something else
> (should that ever happen :-) cause less of the documentation to break.
>
> -Dale
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
