I second both notions... anything that keeps the config clear & concise is a +.

Dave

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Lukasz Lenart
<lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2010/4/11 Christian Stone <xt...@stonescape.net>:
>>  I was very happy to upgrade my decorators and some of my action results to 
>> Freemarker while using the new sitemesh plugin (being able to mix multiple 
>> result handlers such as velocity and freemarker without having to switch 
>> them all over at once).  A huge gotcha I kept running in to was <result 
>> type="velocity">myresultfile.ftl</result>.  Note the Freemarker file and 
>> velocity specification for the result.  I kept running into this while doing 
>> search/replace for certain files and forgetting the type specification while 
>> migrating velocity files to Freemarker.  What do you think about allowing a 
>> specification of the result type, but if one isn't specified it will inspect 
>> by extension and map it to a result type for you, defaulting to a base type 
>> if it is unclear.  If you take a page from Ibatis SqlMaps, you could 
>> specify...
>>        <typeAlias extension="vm"  type="velocity" />
>>        <typeAlias extension="ftl" type="freemarker" />
>>        <typeAlias extension="xhtml" type="freemarker" />      <-- I use this 
>> in Idea to keep from going insane when using Idea+Freemarker.
>> or
>>        <typeAlias mapping="*.ftl" type="freemarker" />
>>
>> Then you would not need quite so much configuration in your configuration :)
>>
>> <action name="index" class="myclass" method="list">
>>     <result>index.ftl</result>
>>     <result name="error">myError.vm</result>
>>     <result name="input">myError.jsp</result>
>> </action>
>
> It's a brilliant solution in my opinion, please register an issue to
> not forget about that!
>
>> or how about defining default elements for all the Action.RESULT_TYPES 
>> (success, input, error...)  Note that you would still use the result element 
>> for custom names...
>>
>> <action name="index" class="myclass" method="list">
>>     <success>index.ftl</success >
>>     <error>myError.vm</error>
>>     <input>myError.jsp</input>
>>     <result name="myResult">myCustom.ftl</input>
>> </action>
>>
>> instead of...
>>
>> <action name="index" class="myclass" method="list">
>>     <result type="freemarker">index.ftl</result>
>>     <result type="velocity" name="error">myError.vm</result>
>>     <result type="velocity"  name="input">myError.vm</result>
>>     <result type="freemarker"  name="myResult">myCustom.ftl</input>
>> </action>
>>
>> Opinions?  I really believe the configuration is a bit heavy now, and 
>> anything that leads to a reduction of the configuration text is a real boon.
>
> Hmm... I'm not sure but it also can be a nice future ;-)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Kapituła Javarsovia 2010
> http://javarsovia.pl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to