If they are not equivalent types, that means the text in the book is wrong. Then, how can I use LazyDynaBean?
Yes, I am using Struts 1 for a new app. The reason being I have to work on RAD 7.5 in future, and it seems(as I have heard the rumours) that it is not well integrated with Struts 2. I have seen how one can use those interesting "forward engineering" tools in RAD for Struts 1. Besides, I have even heard that presently in industry "Struts 1" is in most use. So, both these reasons make studying Struts 1.x a worth shot, *I think. * * * I know it's a little cumbersome to work on an age old framework. I have worked a little on struts 2 before, thus I know that Struts 2 is far better especially in type conversion, form-filling and has ultimate power due to plug-ins. What do you say? On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > They're not equivalent types. > > Why are you using Struts 1, anyway? Not for a new app, I hope? > > Dave > On Nov 5, 2010 12:50 PM, "Abhishek Agarwal" <abhijh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello there. > > > > I am referring "Struts: complete reference", and it has been mentioned > > there that in chapter 5: > > > > LazyDynaBean searchForm =(LazyDynaBean)form;//where form is of type > > ActionForm inside the action class. > > > > So I get an error of "inconvertible types":LazyDynaBean and ActionForm... > > > > But since it was mentioned in the book, that the above is possible, I > > am not understanding the reason why? Is there a solution on how to use > > LazyDynaBean or should I stick to DynaActionForm? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > >
