2011/2/17 Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com>: > As release manager you can frame the vote however you want. If you > have specific reasons for calling it a Beta release (unfinished > feature, API not yet locked down,) then you can mention them. It's > unlikely the rest of the dev team will revolt and insist on labeling > it GA. ;)
OK, thanks :-) > The convention here (decided long ago) is to use "plain" numbered > versions like 2.3.4 and apply a quality label to them later. It's not > clear whether you want to change that, but if so I'd suggest digging > back through the archives to understand why it was done and then > starting a separate thread to discuss. The answer is simple: I'm using Maven for development basis and it's easy for me to switch between versions. I don't need to go to a web page to check if 2.2.2 is a Beta or GA. I see it just in my pom. Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
