This change can simple lower users' confusion and I suggested it base on my experience. Sometime ago I was developing application with CDI and RESTeasy - both have @Produces annotation and it was very annoying to discover such a mistake during unit tests or even UI tests. It's silly, but it happened to my teammate also, whom didn't expect an annotation with the same name.
The problem is more context specific, now users don't use @Inject because most of them don't know about XWork's @Inject, but when they will start using CDI, they can be confused seeing two the same annotations suggested by IDE. Another thing, XWork's @Inject should be used internally or by plugins developers and occasionally by end-users, naming it @StrutsInject will state that clearly. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
