>> That's correct too, many of the S2 user prefer the XML approach >> (myself included), since allows to do stuff like hot reload in >> devMode, automated documentation, etc. > > In fairness, we could create identical documentation with the > annotations/convention, too, we just don't :)
Oh yes please. I have not found this plugin except with this thread. Looking at it, it was pretty hard to find the docs (not the api docs) explaining the usage. Looking at the plugin, it looks like it is "just another plugin", and I have made the experience to be a bit careful with that kind of side projects. While the Struts core is all well and good, my feeling (!!) as a user is that the plugins are not so well cared. But it is just a feeling. > > When Christian has talked about WebWork, I assumed he was referring to >> the opensymphony stuff (like packaging, etc). Again, there has been >> some debate over as well. >> > My current thought would be to have S2 subsume the package names, but still > have the action framework itself decoupled from the web parts, as it is now, > but bring the XW stuff under the S2 name... I can't think of a better > alternative, anyway. Actually I was speaking on the package names. It was confusing to see they are not apache package names. Cheers > > Dave > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
