org.apache.struts2.xwork; keep it a separate JAR, but part of the S2 project (as it currently is).
Since renaming the package is a breaking change, do we want to make any other API changes to XWork now or are we fine with just changing the package now and making (potential) API changes later? 2011/11/29 Łukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> > 2011/11/29 Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com>: > > As long as it can be referenced as an individual component, I'm not > > super-concerned about what it's called. > > I just wanna clean up what's left after OpenSymphony, as we had the > same issue with DTDs that were pointing to the OpenSymphony site. > > > I agree we need to preserve its utility outside of web-related things, > > though. (I actually *did* use it for a non-web thing once.) > > +1 > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
