On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org> wrote: > It's very hard to think that "next link" provides a good tour of the struts > features (I'm pretty sure it got lost over the years), and then what > features should it describe: Struts 2 or Struts 1? > > If there is one thing that I have never considered clean on the website is > the S1-S2 distinction. I think that it is very hard to the new user > understanding where they are going to go. > > IMO the first page should provide to the user, the chose of one of the two > paths before anything else.
Very much +1. It confused me too when I started with Struts 2 (i have used Struts 1 ages ago). I have currently no idea, but how can we cooperate on our ideas? Is there a Struts Sandbox for non-committer access with asf account? Cheers > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > On 29 November 2011 10:32, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> * Next links on the bottom: i think they are pretty useless. After the >> frontpage the next link is showing the "downloads". It should lead through >> a tutorial, not the standard menu of the page. And it stops on the >> Kickstart FAQ. I highly doubt the sense of this link and would like to >> remove them for sake of minimalism, but of course it is up to you. I have >> left it in until this is discussed. I can live with discussing them after >> the first patch >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
