2011/12/1 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: > I've been silently following this thread :-) Here's my take...
;-) > It would be inappropriate to rename packages in a minor version bump. I > just think that defeats expectations for normal upgrades since minor point > upgrades should be compatible with current code. On the other hand, moving > to version 3 signals quite the upgrade! I am in favor of neither. > > I would actually prefer we call it Struts 2.5 so that you can rename such > packages and escape providing pure backwards compatibility. So keep > org.apache.struts2 and do whatever else package refactoring you need. Maybe you're right, I was too excited about new possibilities and maybe we should do it in smaller steps, the same as you did with Struts 1.x Anyway, renaming and dropping some plugins are still top priority IMHO. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
