I wonder if making configuration pluggable would make sense. Then we could provide XML and Properties configuration plugins and others could add Database backed or Groovy configuration plugins if desired. (*Chris *) On Dec 11, 2011 10:20 AM, "Dave Newton" <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara > <mcucchi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> 1) Can we drop the `.properties` config and move to XML exclusively? > > > > Could you delve deeper into the matter? Personally I have not ever > > used properties stuff, but it is my personal taste (though I see very > > few people use it), I would like to understand why properties file are > > a good candidate to deprecation (I assume that one key point is make > > cleaner the configuration/troubleshooting). > > We recommend XML configuration, and having multiple configuration > points is confusing. I just don't see the point. > > d. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
