Although as far as I remember last time we didn't reach the general
consensus, again I'm for the new layout.

But what about to create a new branch and after, when the site will be in a
consistent state, start a vote?


Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara

Maurizio Cucchiara


On 26 January 2012 11:50, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> finally I would like to commit a patch for the site to use fluido 1.1.
>
> Currently it looks like:
> http://code.grobmeier.de/struts-draft-v4
>
> There is some stuff left to do, but now, since I am able to commit
> myself, I would like to add this new layout now and modify it step by
> step. If the urgent case of a security bugfix comes up, the website
> will do the trick, even when there is some minor stuff to be done.
>
> If you agree, I will commit then. If you find urgent things to be
> changed now, please let me know.
>
> What I have made different the latest commit is: I have removed the
> 2.3.1/2.3.1.1 notification as I think only the most recent downloads
> should appear on top. Also I have corrected the release date of
> 2.3.1.2 which is wrong at the moment :-)
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to