2012/8/6 Philip Luppens <philip.lupp...@gmail.com>: > Just a quick remark: wouldn't a specialised object be a better approach for > this, rather than the entire ValueStack? It seems to me this can get pretty > huge and therefore impact performance/scaling more than the session-based > approach. Having a custom object serialised allows for better control, and > I doubt you'd need everything kept in the ValueStack on your > Redirect-After-Post (I might be wrong about that one, but we've been either > storing some minimal info in the flash scope, or adding it as a request > parameter, and it seemed to be 'good enough').
Yeah, it would be better and thus could also solve other problems like storing entire VS on Wait-and-Execute or Token handling. Will add a task for that Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
