The issue isn't at all related to parameters, it's related to spaghetti
code and the brittle nature of inter-action dependencies.

I suspect it hasn't been addressed because nobody sees it as a particularly
important issue. If you feel otherwise, we have no problem taking a look at
a patch proposal.

Dave

(pardon brevity, typos, and top-quoting; on cell)
On Sep 28, 2012 12:21 PM, "Fredrik Lindberg" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, let's call it "chaining done better", why is there no such thing
> in Struts2? If you read what it says about chaining it is really not
> recommended in the Struts2 documentation, and I agree, because
> parameters are not handled on in a nice way, but why not fix that?
> What is the issue?
>
> True, reloads can be a bit tricky, but that this is in IMHO not an
> issue Struts2 needs to solve. You might, in fact, have the same
> problem if you reload in other cases as well. You could e.g. have
> created some kind of add action and running it again, via a reload,
> might add something twice.
>
> / Fredrik Lindberg (2012-09-28).
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Dave Newton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> >
> >> Don't you agree that you sometimes need to use the redirect-action? In
> >> that case why could Struts2 not just provide a different result-type
> >> that skips the browser redirect and just returns the result of the
> >> following action right away?
> >
> >
> > That's called action chaining. Your issue with that regards parameters.
> The
> > same parameter problem would exist if you were forwarding to an action.
> >
> >
> >> I believe I have seen this possibility in
> >> other frameworks and the only bad thing I have heard from others here,
> >> so far, is that the URL will not show correctly in the browser.
> >>
> >
> > And the re-submit problem.
> >
> > Dave
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to