Hi guys, JSR 330 is cool and shall be definitely supported - but you still need fallback metadata mechanism. Drawback of annotatioj is that it is class bound, and thus you can not have two of something without subclassing. Neither can you reconfigure classes coming as jar dependency.
Just EUR 0.02 from picocontainer developer. regadrs, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ ________________________________ From: Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:31 AM Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 Well I know that XWork had its only dependency injection support, but now that Java has a standard dependency injection mechanism, we should definitely go with that. Also it keeps on getting developed with each new EE so it's something we should support as a first-class citizen. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: > 2012/11/28 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: > > What about dropping XWork injection support for JSR 330 (Commons DI)? > > You mean what we have now and use Guice as an internal DI mechanism ? > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
