On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should we think of filing an Infra ticket rather than mail request > regarding spam protection for #1?
I have seen others doing this by simple mail request. I looked for an appropriate Jira module, but was unsure where to file it. Suggestion: I wrote today to infra list. Later this day I will try to ping infra on IRC. If I didn't hear anything by tomorrow, I will file an issue. OK? > Am 19.03.2013 09:26 schrieb "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks for taking the time and explain the situation to me. I appreciate >> it. >> >> i am still behind spam-protecting #1. >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > 2013/3/19 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>: >> >> 1) http://wiki.apache.org/struts >> >> 2) https://cwiki.apache.org/WW/ >> >> 3) https://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/ >> >> 4) https://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/ >> >> >> >> Our homepage links to #3 (which currently looks as it would not have a >> >> stylesheet, btw) >> > >> > Started auto-export by hand, it should be ok in few minutes - I think >> > it happen from time to time as Infra is restoring something on that >> > server ;-) >> > >> >> I know #1 is not maintained. >> >> >> >> What about the other 2 wikis? >> >> >> >> Do we have a chance to kick 3 of the 4 wikis and just go with one? >> > >> > The problem here is that the #2 contains the docs which are included >> > as a part of release (distro) and I have moved some pages sometime ago >> > from #2 to #3 to decrease the size of generated package. As there is >> > no good way to version docs right now, we use such a flow: >> > >> > Confluence to keep docs up-to-date -> autoexport them to cwiki.o.a/WW >> > to be in offline state -> periodically update >> > struts.a.o/development/2.x -> when new release is started, >> > cwiki.o.a/WW is downloaded and assembled with JavaDocs thus gives us >> > struts-2.x.x-docs.zip >> > >> > With such a flow in place with have docs that matches the binary >> > version and source at given point of time, and that's why there were >> > subsites per version :-) >> > >> > So combine all the wikis into one could generate a massive problem >> > here. Also the idea behind #3 is add users a space to express >> > themselves ;-) >> > #4 is to keep the track of all the plugins not only bundled with S2. >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > -- >> > Łukasz >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
