2013/3/19 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: > If we name the Java package "org.apache.struts3", we will keep a migration > path open for *both* S1 and S2. The perspective we should have, I think, is > that we are one of many front-end technologies and it's *necessary* for > multiple versions of Struts to be used at the same time. Even if it is not > necessary for small projects, it makes adopting Struts 3 easier in large > organizations because we are allowing incremental migration.
I rather thought about leaving o.a.struts2 as is, just cut out what is deprecated and old. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
