Sorry Maurizio, can you elaborate a little more on the -1? I can't see how our suggested fix for the stacktrace does in any way interfere with the issue you mentioned. Maybe I miss the point.
Cheers, Christian On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4030 > > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > On 27 March 2013 13:07, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 2013/3/27 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>: >>>> Its also there with 2.3.12, but not with 2.3.8. >>>> >>>> I tried to track it down and I think its because of rv1433644. Around >>>> line it previously showed: >>>> >>>> LOG.debug("Unable to load optional class: " + ex); >>>> >>>> Now it is: >>>> >>>> LOG.debug("Unable to load optional class: #0", ex, impl); >>>> >>>> Not sure if we need the full exception stacktrace when we didn't find >>>> an optional class. >>>> if you agree, I change it too: >>>> >>>> LOG.debug("Unable to load optional class: #0", impl); >>>> >>>> Wdyt? >>> >>> You are right, nice work :-) >> >> Committed with rv1461544 (WW-4029), thanks for the help :-) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
