Am 02.09.13 22:13, schrieb Ken McWilliams: > A bit off topic, but on the subject of clean up the struts2 tag reference > has been out of date for ages with respect to telling you if the attribute > is evaluated for ognl by default or not. > > http://struts.apache.org/release/2.3.x/docs/tag-reference.html > > Check the "if" and "property" tags, the "test" and "value" attributes > respectively are marked as "false" under the evaluated heading which is > clearly false. As a matter of fact I can't find one instance of "true" for > any attribute under any tag!
very welcome feedback. Actually I believe a Wiki is not the best tool for documentation. I am sticking to this project for a while now, but I could not tell from mind how to properly update the docs. I think if we could give the wider community a chance to easily contribute to the docs, we would have a huge win. For example, if you (Ken) would have the chance to change the problem you found within 2 minutes, you certainly would have done so already. > Ascetics count. I like the new struts2 page "http://struts.apache.org/"; and > kudos struts2 community on that. Thanks! We are using the Apache Maven Fluido plugin here, which uses Bootstrap (just in case you want to use it too :-)) > However when people on stackoverflow ask when should they use "%{}" being > able to point them at the tag reference would make the most sense... You mean, OGNL docs are lacking? You are right. I just discussed that with a few fellows at Google Hangout. That said, its worth to separate this into a on thread, which i did now. Not sure if the idea to switch to a different documentation system finds support. If it does, lets discuss what opportunities we have. Cheers On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Steven Benitez <steven.beni...@gmail.com>wrote: > This sounds good to me. A more up to date site would be good. > > On Monday, September 2, 2013, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > at our main page are the following links: > > > > http://struts.SourceForge.net/ -> pretty outdated, last update from > > 2006 it seems > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rubys/planet/struts -> doesn't look too good > > for us either... > > > > http://www.ApacheBookstore.com/ -> Is this still maintained? > > > > In general I am doubting the sense of the page at struts.apache.org. > > As we don't maintain S1 anymore, we could move a lot of it to S2 page, > > leaving the main page with something similar like we have at logging: > > > > http://logging.apache.org > > > > Questions: > > > > 1) Are you fine if I would remove the links mentioned above? > > 2) Are you fine to move to a simpler landing page (on the long term)? > > > > Cheers > > Christian > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org <javascript:;> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org<javascript:;> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
