I feel pretty strongly that we should not broaden the API to accommodate users who don't know how to use the existing API, which is really pretty straight forward. We'd be better off educating users how the existing interceptor API works rather than introducing new complexity.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: > 2013/11/5 Steven Benitez <steven.beni...@gmail.com>: > > Why not just create an interceptor and run it before or after the > > interceptor you need? What specific use case does this address? > > You are perfectly right, it's the prefer way to achieve the same behaviour. > > But there are some users which just stick with defaultStack or > cannot/don't know how to modify the defaultStack - and it's solution > just for them. Maybe I'm wrong and we should educated users to don't > stick with default stack and always prepare their own stack (at least > to improve performance). > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
