Yes, we could use Onyx's interface mechanism, but I think SLF4j's is probably more stable and definitely more supported. So I'd probably recommend that we extract the SLF4j support object and use it directly (or at least make it the default). If it's something that you're interested in, I'd have to fill out the forms to become a committer on Struts. Where would I find that information? (*Chris*)
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote: > Updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+Next > > 2014-05-14 21:26 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > > 2014-05-14 19:33 GMT+02:00 Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com>: > >> If you want a really powerful version of what they did, check out my > onyx > >> project (https://code.google.com/p/anodyzed/). It's kind of been > >> languishing since I haven't found too many people that really care about > >> logging efficiency, but I'd be totally willing to donate the code to > >> Struts2 (and do some of the work of integrating it) if it's something > you'd > >> be interested in. > > > > Thanks Chris, looks very interesting! I'd say even very very interesting: > > > > log.debug("Simple {0}, More Complex {1.lastname}, Even More Complex > > {2.address.city}, Most Complex {1.birthDate,date,yyyyMMdd}", 5, user, > > company); > > > > And I understood that we can even extract current logging layer into > > plugins and leave just pure interfaces in core and let users decided > > what logging library they want to use just by dropping in one of the > > plugins :D > > > > > > Regards > > -- > > Łukasz > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > > > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
