Github user pbenedict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/11#issuecomment-43356862
Since the ExcludePatternChecker already logs the value and the matched
pattern being excluded, I don't think we should repeat that logging again by
the caller... or at least trim down the caller's logging to just say something
has been excluded (cause the callee is already logging that detail).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
