I look towards the ActionInvocation or ActionProxyFactory but the problem with this solution is that we do not know what Stack is executed. I also look towards a placeholder, but the problem is the same as previously.
To clarify, my need: I want to allow the inclusion of a library in the classpath enable features brought by it without changing the configuration of the main project. I hope you understand, because I know that my English is very bad (I'm french) /** * Gildas de Cadoudal * 115, rue Mazarin * 33000 Bordeaux * (+33) (0)6 60 13 80 90 * (+33) (0)9 50 15 62 40 * gildas.de.cadou...@gmail.com **/ On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Greg Huber <gregh3...@gmail.com> wrote: > What would be useful, if you could have a place holder in the interceptor > stack and then inject the interceptor element you need on the action? > > Copying the whole lot each time makes a lot more maintenance and more prone > to errors. > > > On 3 July 2014 02:32, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Most of the time, if not 99% of the time, all I want to do is add an >> interceptor before or after some known interceptor. As I've gone on record >> before, I want this feature too :-) >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ken McWilliams <ken.mcwilli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Thank you Lukasz I'll put it on my todo list ;) >> > >> > Martin, interceptor stacks are efficient I think the scope struts2 has is >> > very good, still it is fun to push boundaries, one of those fun higher >> > initiatives would be a Web IDE for struts2. You could dynamically build >> an >> > interceptor stack, and you could step though the stack keeping an eye on >> > the action as part of the debug process, (values before and after >> > interceptor)... >> > >> > So in short no there isn't anything that can't be done with non dynamic >> > stacks, but in the name of learning this web framework and making things >> > more efficient- being able to dynamically alter the stacks is very >> > interesting. At the end the the day the idea was to write out a >> non-dynamic >> > struts.xml for production deployment. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > 2014-07-02 19:38 GMT+02:00 Ken McWilliams <ken.mcwilli...@gmail.com>: >> > > > This is somethings I've wanted to do (dynamically change the >> > interceptor >> > > > stack), I'm not at a development machine so have not checked the >> > > > plausibility of the following but would like input: >> > > > >> > > > Is it possible to create a custom ActionInvocation object, for this >> > > purpose? >> > > > Is it possible to essentially recreate the functionality of >> > > > ActionInvocation within an interceptor which then delegates to other >> > > > interceptors? >> > > >> > > Hm... yeah, with custom ActionInvocation and ActionProxyFactory should >> > > do the trick, check the REST Plugin to see what must be implemented to >> > > create your own ActionInvocation >> > > >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > -- >> > > Ćukasz >> > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org