I used package-level interceptors from time to time, mostly for really easy auth interceptors applied to chunks of pages. There was some other use-case I had, but I can't recall what it was; it was related to some data transformations.
It also provides a mechanism for grouping actions together in a logical way w/o having to rely on consistent URL naming convention that can be fat-fingered pretty easily, but I'm not sure that counts as "really valuable". On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > One concept I never really liked in S2 are namespaces. I never found a good > reason to logically group actions together with common interceptor setup. > Rather I always find myself in the situation where the interceptor stack is > globally set and actions have one-off changes. And I also never liked how > namespaces limit the scope of result types. > > Am I right or is this feature really valuable? > -- e: davelnew...@gmail.com m: 908-380-8699 s: davelnewton_skype t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
