2015-11-21 1:20 GMT+01:00 Ken McWilliams <ken.mcwilli...@gmail.com>: > Everything sounds great. I do recommend keeping the regex matching. I it's > hard to know which types of view support should be dropped, I think it is > better to err on the side of inclusion.
Yes, support for RegEx will follow > On another front, don't you like how they select the type of matcher by > using a prefix in the string? "OGNL:" , "regex:", etc., I thought that was > pretty slick., we only allow one matcher... I mean they could have used > another tag attribute to account for that, but putting it in the string > reads better. I have used the same idea in case of SMI, it's used internally. Do you have another idea where to use it? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
