In generally I really like the idea. But how should maven publish work with this groupId?
Best Regards Johannes ################################################# web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2016-10-20 6:18 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > Rather an universal groupId, something like net.liftmodules in the > Lift framework http://www.liftweb.net/lift_modules > > 2016-10-19 22:45 GMT+02:00 Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org > >> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:09:48 +0200 > >> Subject: Using org.apache.struts2.plugin > >> To: dev@struts.apache.org > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> What do you think about allowing third parties to use > >> "org.apache.struts2.plugin" namespace in their plugins? > >> > > MG>if i'm understanding correctly org.apache.struts2.plugin could somehow > > morph into a published namespace? > > MG>then the org.apache.struts2.plugin declaration could force data-types > > and ordering to adhere to published schema > > MG>speaking of which is there a published xsd schema for > > org.apache.struts.plugin? > > > > MG>or would org.apache.struts2.plugin be more of a universal groupId? > > > >> Regards > >> -- > >> Łukasz > >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
