> On 11/27/2017 2:22 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> Struts 2.5.14 is officially out so we can start working on Struts 2.6 :) >> >> I think we can basically merge all the open PRs, adjust Servlet API >> version and release a first beta version :) >> https://github.com/apache/struts/pulls >>
On 11/17/2017 3:46 PM, René Gielen wrote: [1] > +1 - not again - please don't use "Servlet 3" in any name. "Async" is the > asset, so let's name it like that > It's also valid for Servlet 4.0, isn't it? :) We should better stay with > features than with version numbers, we had this problem already with adding > the 2 to the product brand name (Struts 2) - will a 3.0 release called Struts > 3 or Struts 2 3.x ?? Same goes for Servlet versioning. So I'm still +1 for a > refactoring I am wondering why we don't solve this one time for ever in 2.6 major version? In technical point-of-view we can simply refactor all Struts 2 to Struts and then just preparing a migration guide. I know there are maybe a lot of works and side effects but they will be finished one they and the world will forget, I think. What do you think? Regards. [1] https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/179#issuecomment-345228928
