Blair Zajac wrote: > On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:05 PM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: > > > Author: cmpilato > > Date: Wed Nov 18 07:05:14 2009 > > New Revision: 881687 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881687&view=rev > > Log: > > Sync with trunk. (Merged /subversion/trunk:r879262-881562.) > > On these large merge commits, it would be good to state the > destination of the merge, otherwise one has to click on the link to > see which branch was brought up to date.
It's in the email message subject line :-) - Julian p.s. We really ought to invent a way of automatically annotating svn logs with the branch name - either inserted in the message itself, or printed by "svn log" - I know that means we need a concept of branches, at some level, but it could be a bolt-on (sorry, plug-in) per-project concept rather than a core concept.
