cc: dev-at-subversion-dot-apache-dot-org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, 16 November 2009 6:03 AM > To: Mark Phippard > Cc: Lieven Govaerts; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RFC] Move buildbot master to ASF infrastructure > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:46, Mark Phippard <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Lieven Govaerts <[email protected]> > wrote: > >... > >> - ASF's buildbot already has Ubuntu and Windows server 2008 slaves > >> (and according to Gavin also Windows XP 64 bit and Solaris) and there > >> are plans to add more. There's no Mac yet, but we have one in our > >> setup. > > > > In the case of Windows, do they also have Visual Studio and all the > > extras needed to actually build SVN? > > Yup. Remember that MSFT is a platinum sponsor of the ASF :-) ... they > were also providing licenses to asf devs long before that, too. I have an MSDN acct created specifically for the purpose of using with the ASF Infra, including buildbot stuff, so we dont have a problem. Gav... > > >... > > Given our familiarity with it, I think it makes sense to stick with > > buildbot. That said, I like Hudson and we have done some work > > recently so that our build and test can integrate nicely. For > > example, Hudson can display the test results a lot more nicely and it > > graphs things like the execution time that can help spot trends. I > > personally prefer buildbots red/green model over Hudson's "weather > > report". > > We can use both. No rule that says "pick one". > > >... > >> So, thoughts? Remarks? > > > > With everything going on, my only comment would be to slow down. I do > > not see any reason to rush into this (too many changes happening at > > once). > > *shrug* ... this stuff parallelizes pretty easily. > > Cheers, > -g > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.62/2499 - Release Date: 11/14/09 > 19:42:00
