On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:02:39PM +0100, Martin Furter wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:36:13AM +0100, Martin Furter wrote:
> >We'd have to store the view name and the associated depths
> >somewhere where we can get at it later.
>
> The associated depths are stored one layer below views using the
> sparse directories so we just have to store the view name. We could
> also store the filename to be able to reread it (and error if it's
> invalid).
I'd rather store another copy of the depths somewhere, so that
we don't lose track of what the current view should be in case
people manually change depths of directories in the WC.
> >Once that works, try to get svn update --view to work.
>
> I think we should sort out the update cases first, or at least think
> about some edge cases which will influence checkout.
> I still wonder if 'sticky' is worth all the additional complexity.
> But it doesn't interfere with checkout (except storing the view
> name) so I can start working on it.
Yes, checkout, in its simplest form (just get all directoties at the
depths defined in the view, don't remember anything about the view)
should be independent this.
Stefan
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
--
printf("Eh???/n");
