On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:06 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote:
> NOTE: I'm making two assumptions here: (1) that we would never consider > using a Wiki that didn't send page change notifications to our commits@ list > (or maybe a dedicated wiki@), and (2) that any wiki service that the ASF > provided would be covered by their backup mechanisms. > > What say you? I'd like to add one more thing here. Presumably a primary goal in moving some content to a wiki is to be able to widen the net of who can edit the pages. So we also need to know how those controls work at ASF. While we may get tired of applying and committing patches to some of the pages, it is a heck of a lot better than a Wiki if these same users cannot just add the content themselves. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
