Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 08:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Some time ago, Ben Collins-Sussman shared with us some of the Google
>> teams'
>> findings about APR's memory subsystem[1].  In his mail, he says
>> (among other
>> things) the following:
>
> Are there any plans to get this into APR upstream?  I could definitely
> use it on our in-house multithreaded server.

Plans? the patch is here; if you were good all year, you may get a
Christmas present. :)

-- Brane

Reply via email to