Blair Zajac wrote: > On 12/14/2009 08:23 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Some time ago, Ben Collins-Sussman shared with us some of the Google >> teams' >> findings about APR's memory subsystem[1]. In his mail, he says >> (among other >> things) the following: > > Are there any plans to get this into APR upstream? I could definitely > use it on our in-house multithreaded server.
Plans? the patch is here; if you were good all year, you may get a Christmas present. :) -- Brane