It's more than just a folder rename, since we have to reconfigure
stuff on the server.

Hyrum: what kind of "related" stuff are you talking about? And why
would it then be in a folder called "site" when it isn't ON the site?

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 13:56, Mark Phippard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We recently moved all of our web content out of trunk and into it's own 
>> top-level directory,
>> called site/.  I propose we move it once more to site/publish/.  This would 
>> allow us to put
>> additional related-but-not-published material in the site/ directory, and 
>> follows precedent in
>> other Apache projects.
>>
>> If there are no objections, I'll do the move and file a corresponding ticket 
>> with the infra group
>> tomorrow.
>
> It is ultimately just a folder name in the repos, so I cannot see
> anyone objecting ... and I do not.  I am curious what sort of items
> would go in /site though?
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to