On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:19:27AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the >> > release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8. The only blocker for rolling is the >> > r896522, r896547 which addresses a regression found in the 1.6.7 tarball >> > (and uncovered by the ruby bindings). As soon as this fix is backported, >> > I'll roll 1.6.8. >> > >> > In the meantime, please revert the r896522, r896547 group, as well as any >> > other items which should be included in 1.6.8. >> >> That should be *review the r896522, r896547 group*, not "revert". > > I'll commit my +1 in a minute. > > Note that Paul added a new file resolve_tests.py to 1.6.x which has > an Apache 2.0 license header. Should the license header be changed > for backport?
No, we already distribute files with different licenses (even no license) in them so I do not see where it would matter. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
