On 02/03/2010 10:39, Philip Martin wrote:
Matthew Bentham<mj...@artvps.com> writes:
+svn_wc__node_is_status_copied(svn_boolean_t *is_copied,
+ svn_wc_context_t *wc_ctx,
+ const char *local_abspath,
+ apr_pool_t *scratch_pool)
+{
+ svn_wc__db_status_t status;
+ svn_boolean_t added;
+
+ SVN_ERR(svn_wc__node_is_status_added(&added, wc_ctx, local_abspath,
+ scratch_pool));
+ if (!added)
+ {
+ *is_copied = FALSE;
+ return SVN_NO_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_addition(&status,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ wc_ctx->db, local_abspath,
+ scratch_pool, scratch_pool));
+ *is_copied = (status == svn_wc__db_status_copied);
What about svn_wc__db_status_moved_here? That's a copy where the
source happened to be deleted as well. What should _is_status_copied
return? How should calculate_target_mergeinfo handle _moved_here?
Like copied or like added?
+
+ return SVN_NO_ERROR;
Perhaps calculate_target_mergeinfo should simply call _scan_addition
to get the added/copied/moved status?
It could do, but _scan_addition is private to libsvn_wc right now, like
_read_info (and indeed _status_copied and the other status
enumerations). I understood the plan to be that for now we add small
routines that call __db routines internally?
Matthew
